Uncategorized

What’s Wrong With Us?

10

We date. And date. And date. But why can’t we get to the next level? What’s wrong with us?

Glad you asked. Because now there’s a book. Says author Jillian Straus of her new book, Unhooked Generation:


This book explores why so many of us face a rocky, detained, or pit-fallen
road to long-term commitment. Why is the search for love so difficult for us,
and what can we do about it?First I will take you through my own story as a
typical thirtysomething single, urban professional. Then I will examine the
cultural factors uniquely affecting this generation, what I call “The Seven Evil
Influences,” that undermine our relationships every day. Through the stories of
single men and women I will explore how these influences make us look at
potential partners, how they confuse the dance by which we court each other,
change how we perceive commitment, and pose real obstacles on the path to
romantic fulfillment.


I’m tired of these books: what’s wrong with us, why can’t we, why isn’t he into you…it’s enough to drive a person mental. Or, as it’s known in the scientific parlance: the week before Valentine’s Day.

There’ll be more. Because there’s always more. And it’s only February 9.

Love-a-Mensch Week

6

No, I’m not kidding. And yes, I wish I were.

Leave it to JDate and love coach Robin Gorman Newman to bring you this week, which just so happens to lead up to Valentine’s Day. Coincidence?

According to a PR Newswire alert, JDate asked members to select their favorite single celebrity mensches. “Mensches are the people that every mother would love,” said Robin Gorman Newman, creator of ‘Love a Mensch Week’ and author of “How to Marry a Mensch.”

Women prefer Braff. Of course. Zach Braff got 27% of the vote. Then, the poll gets a little strange. Sex and the City’s Mr. Big himself, Chris Noth (since when is he Jewish? Maybe he just fits Newman’s definition…) gets 20% of the vote, same as #3 pick, Howard Stern. (What? I know.) Then we’ve got Brody (Adrien), Brody (Adam) and Brooks (Al, which I can only imagine refers to Albert Brooks).

And the men like themselves some Portman–Natalie ranked at 46%, with Sarah Silverman and Lisa Loeb rounding out the top three. (Trailing these three are Winona Ryder–still, guys?–and Jamie Lynn Sigler.)

How am I not ever on this list? Oh yeah. Not a celebrity. Yet.

Oh, and by the way…not for nothing, as they say, but: Braff, dating a non-Jew; Portman, loves Israel but is always dating non-Jews; Silverman, dating Jimmy Kimmel. There are more, but I don’t want to depress myself. Again, not that there’s anything wrong with finding love. I mean, most of the commenters here are looking for that same thing, but you understand my issue…

Carnival’s A-Coming…

1

…sometime over the next two days, I’ll probably post the next edition of Mars & Venus Go To Shul: the Jewish Singles and Dating Blogcarnival. Things are starting a little slow with this carnival, because I’ve been traveling so much. But if you’d like to submit to this edition, please let me know. And if you’d like to host the blogcarnival on your blog, please speak up, kids!

In the interim, here’s something you might appreciate…

We all say we’re looking for someone who speaks our language. But maybe that’s just a metaphor. Now we don’t have to limit ourselves. Or at least men don’t have to thusly limit themselves: A new service called CuteOnly.com introduces Russian women to men all over the world using an online, automated translation feature. Hooray.

(via Online Personals Watch)

Do You “Need a Mensch”?

3

If you’re holding out for a hero mensch, you might enjoy Frumster’s latest viral video, scripted by the online dating company and creatively designed and animated by ShaBot’s Aba, Ben Baruch.

“Enjoy!”

Older Men, Revisited

9

A recent post by Chayyei Sarah, titled “No More Creepy Old Guys,” has inspired me to reopen the earlier discussion on older men/younger women. She notes that on one of the internet dating services she frequents (although I’m not sure she’d love my using that term), DosiDate, they’ve just instituted age limits to their member searches.

“Given how many men in their 50’s have “initiated contact” with me through the various dating websites on which I’m a member,” she says, “you can bet I went into my Dosidate account right away to set up an acceptable age range.” She says she was “extremely liberal,” in both directions, when setting the boundaries, but that her “policy has long been that if a man is closer to my father’s age than he is to mine, he’s just out of luck. My father was 24 when I was born. You do the math.”

She also makes some important distinctions, that there’s a difference between slightly older and creepy older men looking for trophy wives, that men and women should both be a little more open-minded in the dating process, but that both sides have to be realistic. Feel free to go over there and comment, or carry on the conversation here, as you’ve been doing, even while I was away.

I know that people feel very passionately about this issue, and that’s leading to some people being accusatory and judgmental, and others becoming defensive…let’s keep the discussion civil, and agree to disagree where we have to.

I maintain, as I said on CS’s site, that online dating, although good at expanding the circles, which is unquestionably the name of the game in Jewish dating, also offers us a chance to reject someone based on a different set of criteria than we might observe if our original encounter is face-to-face.

Picture it…thirtysomething you goes to a party. Friends introduce you to a man who has a friendly, open smile, a warm sense of humor and an engaging demeanor. As you talk, you determine an intellectual–and, what’s that?–a religious/spiritual compatibility. Then later, you find out that the person is in his late forties or early fifties. You may feel a momentary disappointment that the person doesn’t share your immediate frame of reference, but if there’s enough “else” there, you probably won’t care. Because it’s about connecting with a person. One friend of mine married a man in his fifties who already had five kids, one of them with a child…The couple had a baby about a year later, a few months after one of the other kids had a baby, rendering my friend a grandmother before she was even a mother.

There are, of course, exceptions. A friend of mine recently told me about a man who was in his late fifties who wanted to date her; she liked him, but she was concerned. If things worked out, he’d be in his sixties when their kids were born, seventies when they were in high school and college, and it was likely that my friend would at some point, end up bearing the lion’s share of the parenting, either through infirmity, or decreased energy due to aging, or G-d forbid, even because of an early widowhood.

True, no one can know what life has in store. Philanthropists become victims in fatal traffic accidents, and terrorism cuts off lives in their prime. Illness knows no good timing or age or circumstance. Those are things we cannot control. But is it any wonder that for women in their thirties, what they’re ideally looking for is to maximize their chances with a partner they can build a life with, and with whom they can grow old, together?

A radical idea? Eliminate the age range entirely, and have people respond solely to picture and profile content. Rumor has it people mostly respond to pictures anyway…

Very Interesting Discussion, Kids…

2

For the most part, very well-behaved, respectful discussion of two very interesting subjects: friends with benefits, and age-based dating decisions. I enjoyed checking in with the conversation from various tropical climes, and once I’ve fully read through the discussion thread from start to finish, I will hopefully get around to doing some additional commenting on the subjects myself!

Things you can do to entertain yourselves in the interim:

— Visit Hilary and Annabel Lee (as well as constant supporters C and Ken “Long-Lost” Wheaton), and show them some comments love
— Vote over at the JIBs (Jewish and Israel Blog Awards)
— Visit Jewlicious and read about our upcoming conference on Jewish identity
Register for said conference
— Check out “It’s a Blog World After All,” an article in the Jewish Journal about Jewish blogs

Vote early, vote semi-often

2

On Esther’s behalf, while she’s sailing the high seas, I thought I’d let y’all know that you can now vote for JDaters Anonymous for Best Jewish Humor Blog over in the JIB Finals.

And My Urban Kvetch is a finalist for Best Jewish Culture Blog.

You can vote every three days between now and 2 February 2006.

Best of luck to all the finalists! (Which – sob – does not include me.)

“Friends With Benefits”

52

About this Friends-with-Benefits situation…

I know what the components are: friendship + fooling around. But I’ve never been able to understand it fully. Maybe I’m looking at things in black-and-white, but the way I see it, if you’re attracted to someone, and you like their personality and want to hang out with them, why isn’t that called–or why wouldn’t you want it to be called–a relationship?

Which of these elements is present in a relationship that is not present in a FWB scenario?

  • Trust
  • Attraction
  • Mutuality
  • Convenience
  • Understanding of the rules
  • Respect
  • Concern

I suppose if both people are equally invested in the casual nature of the relationship as FWBs, then it’s fine. But how do you ensure that both of those people are on the exact same wavelength at the exact same time? And how do you prevent attachment?

Is such a relationship by definition limited in duration, until the whim of either party expires, or can it go on for years as long as both parties acquiesce? And again, absent the formal declaration of an agreement, does such a tacit arrangement constitute the very commitment the pair of FWBs are seeking to elude?

One last question…is FWBs more generally acceptable in the college-age population? Can people in their thirties and forties engage in these kinds of relationships with impunity, or is there always ultimately a price to pay?

I’m sure other people will have opinions on this. So I’m going to board a boat and let the sparks fly while I’m away…who knows? Maybe I’ll even give you some guest bloggers…

“…Exciting and New…”

3

I’m off to cruise the Caribbean with Jewish singles. Why? To make sure that you guys have interesting material to keep you warm throughout the winter months. And because I need some relaxation that doesn’t involve hibernating in my apartment in flannel pajamas because it’s too cold to even let my feet touch the uncarpeted floor. (Want to read my Urban Kvetch post about going on the cruise? Don’t let me stop you.)

Internet access will be expensive and limited, so I can’t promise heavy posting. But I’m going to try to do some posts in advance so you’ll have what to talk about while I’m away.

Let’s start with a controversial topic:

Love…is it really “exciting and new”? Or is love comfort, stability, and calm?

And what is the craziest thing you’ve ever done for love (or for the possibility of love)?

Resolution: Post Links to Articles Sooner

5

OK, so I’ve missed a column or two. So here are the last two columns I’ve not linked to yet…coincidentally, the first two columns of 2006:

What You Can’t Leave Behind


Last Friday night, a few blocks from home, I sat in a row of chairs along a sanctuary wall. This particular synagogue was not some place I’d normally go, but accompanied by the excuse of friends from out of town, I tried something new-ish along with my Jewish. It wasn’t the traditional service I was used to; many congregants danced as they celebrated the incoming Sabbath, and a few white-clad, barefoot Jews reminded me of the hordes I had seen emerging from L.A.’s Kabbalah Centre in September. It was foreign but spirited, revealing an enthusiasm for prayer and Shabbat that I hadn’t felt in a while.

After the Jews had been seated, the rabbi asked us to close our eyes. As we headed into Shabbat — which happened to coincide with the weekend of Rosh Chodesh, the new moon, and which was also marked on the Gregorian calendar as “New Year’s Weekend” — the rabbi asked us to think about what we could leave behind during this transitional moment. As I tried to clear my head of weekday clutter, sensory over-stimulation and the teeming army of germs conspiring to attack my sinuses, one word came into my mind: a proper name. As the year slipped away, I knew what I had to leave behind…

Soul (Mates) on Ice (no, I don’t understand the title either)


Four 30-something women sat at a table, talking about relationships — it all seemed very “Sex and the City,” only with maki sushi instead of martinis. The subject was soulmates. “You have a net of available soulmate options,” someone
said. “But some of them are quick minnows. You think they’re there and available, but they dart away.” The soulmates-as-fish-in-the-sea metaphors seemed appropriate, if a little insensitive to the spicy tuna rolls on our plates.


One married friend maintained that soulmates were defined by commitment. “If the commitment readiness isn’t there, he’s not your soulmate.” But did that mean that soulmate was just another synonym for commitment or love? If something is bashert, meant to be, isn’t it always meant to be? And what of fizzled relationships that seemed promising before they plummeted; what of the perceived soulmates gone inexplicably AWOL? ….

Go to Top