JDate’s New Look

18

A friend tipped me off–JDate’s changing, relaunching soon with a new interface and new features, including a magazine. You heard it here, folks…

Check out their teaser…and pay attention to the spelling in Elena’s profile.

Believe me, it’s a good ting they’re being so up front about the fact that most of the profiles will have spelling errors in them…

And does anyone think the music sounds a little bit, um, porny? (Not that I’d know what that sounds like…)

Guy Sues JDate for Inflicting “Serious Psychological Injury”

7

We’ve all been there, right? We chat with someone online, things seem to be going well, and then you get the email: “you’ve been rejected.”

Well, this guy’s taking his JDate rejection and humiliation to court:


[Los Angeles Plaintiff Soheil] Davood claims the subscriber wanted to talk to him and even convinced him to call directly when he became tired and wanted to go to sleep. When the plaintiff called, he “received a taunting automated message telling him that he was rejected.”

Davood, who is seeking unspecified compensatory and punitive damages, claims the Web site is “defective” because it was poorly designed and monitored, which exposed him to “serious psychological injury.” (NBC News)

Is a dating website “defective” if you don’t find love? Would you ever sue an online dating service for damages? And if you did, what would you seek as compensation? So many questions in a litigious society in an internet age…

Tangled Web

5

It’s like an episode of Friends. I know. They don’t know I know. Or they wish I didn’t. But I do. Still, no one says a thing. I’ve asked, and had my queries laughed at. But I’d have to be an idiot to not know.

Of course it would be hard to learn, finally, after so much time and energy spent wondering and multiple denials, that such suspicions were more than just paranoia, but I always remember the old phrase: Just because you’re paranoid doesn’t mean they’re not out to get you. Not because they hate you. Because they love you, and they don’t know how to tell you. They’re afraid of how it might affect you, and they’re right to be. But the truth is more important, because I’ve asked before, and they’ve lied. For my own good, they undoubtedly told themselves in justification, but still. There it is. The object that obstructs my moving forward. The roadkill that used to be my trusting heart. I understand why they’re scared to say anything.

There may be another angle, that they’re scared to vocalize, to admit to themselves in a way that might make it real. So let’s bring yet another elephant into the room and try to ignore that one, too.

Of course, they don’t have to tell me, because I already know. The facts already affect me, almost as much as the lies by omission. And in this state, still wounded, we’re all trapped here together, without any chance for progress or hope of sutures.

Still, with them knowing I know, it would be nice to finally know. You know?

Random Thought of the Day

13

Only this, and nothing more…

When it comes to boys, the thin, pretty girls always win.

Every Number Is The Loneliest Number

3

Loneliness is a funny thing. Not in the “har-dee-har-har” type of way, obviously. But in a grander sense, loneliness is not defined by who you’re with or who you’re not with; it’s an inner state that sometimes dwells dormant and other times explodes, or simmers, corroding from within, and sometimes even seems one of the more self-indulgent of emotional states.

Who are we to feel lonely? We can seek out the company of others. We can momentarily drown out the refrains of “I’mlonelyI’mlonelyI’mlonely” with loud music or distracting movies or sorting socks in drawers or fiddling with digital photos and blog templates.

You can feel lonely in a room full of people. You can feel lonely and alone inside your head. You can feel lonely in a point of view, or political opinion, or on the highways and freeways even as cars or thoughts speed by. You can feel lonely in the contemplation of a strong, or suffering, spiritual state. You can feel lonely in the excruciating moment you realize a hoped-for romance has turned platonic. You can feel lonely as you notice love or beauty in others and know that you have no part in it.

You can feel lonely because you yourself are sad, or dissatisfied, or bored, or frustrated. You can feel lonely when you’re the only one who understands the situation fully. You can feel lonely when you know friends are keeping things from you, even if their intentions are good. You can feel lonely at your own birthday party. You can feel lonely on a beach, or driving through a canyon, or watching a sunset. You can feel lonely knowing that there’s a joke or reference you’re not a part of; and even if you have it explained to you by insiders, you still don’t find it funny, and knowing it doesn’t make you one of them. It never will. And that’s lonely.

Top Five: Worst Opening Words in Online Dating Profiles

15

I’m sure you’re all very nice people, you who have used these opening lines. But maybe you’re not aware that sometimes, we can only see the first five to eight words of your profile without clicking to expand it. So think about which words are the first ones we’ll see. Because you never get a second chance to make a first impression:

1. I work hard and play…[hard]
2. Hi I’m [NAME ALREADY LISTED IN THE PROFILE] and I’m [AGE ALREADY LISTED IN THE PROFILE]
3. I don’t know why I’m on JDate…/My friends are making me do this…
4. Give me a reason to quit JDate.
5. Hello ladies! I am looking for a woman…

And yes, there are more. These are just the ones that are irking me at this particular second.

“We Were Married in a Past Life”

2

According to Reuters, there’s this Manhattan doctor who pretended to be single in order to woo two women who he met online; furthermore, he told them that they had been married in their past lives and that in this life, they were bound to rectify the mistakes they had made while married in that past life. Still following? Good. Because here’s the kicker, that guy who was married in his past life to these two women? Was also married in this life…

A Manhattan fertility specialist has been sued by two women who say he broke their hearts after meeting them through an online dating site on which he pretended to be single.

In their lawsuits the two women, Tiffany Wang and Jing Huang, accused Dr. Khaled Zeitoun, 46, of pretending to be single and using mind games to entice them into sexual relationships with tales of past lives.

According to court papers filed in Manhattan Supreme Court and made public this week, Zeitoun is married with three children. Wang said she met him in March 2001 through a Web site on which he said he was single and had never married.

“Zeitoun claimed he and Wang had been married to each other in previous lives,” Wang’s lawsuit said, adding that the doctor told her he had mistreated her in that life and “searched for her in this lifetime to correct his past mistakes.”

Wang says that in May 2002, he asked her to marry him but only proposed “to see the look of joy on her face.”

His marriage ended in 2004. And I bet he never saw it coming.

The Week in Dating

1

Time for another Carnivalesque post…

I have to lead with my account of a singles event I went to two weeks ago. (Nepotism? Egomania? Sure. Isn’t that why you come here?)


Last Thursday night, I went on a cruise along the Hudson River with about three hundred Jewish singles. I would have called it a Jews Booze Cruise, but it was a cash bar (the bastards). Here are some random thoughts I scribbled down at the night’s end:

Trapped on a boat with Jewish singles and a cash bar may be worse than going down on the Titanic. Like the old joke, but with no end: iceberg, Goldberg, Rosenberg…what’s the difference?

I would really like it if people stopped referring to Titanic and Gilligan’s Island whenever the boat hit a choppy patch of Hudson. Why are there choppy patches on the Hudson, anyway? Is it high tide in the big city, or did Vinnie from Brooklyn just drop a coupla hundred bodies into the river?

I’m calling that guy over there Bruce Jenner. Why? Because he’s wearing a shirt the color of a Wheaties box, and because when I make eye contact with him, he does the Cross-Boat-30-Yard Sprint in the opposite direction.

Plus, is improv comedy like dating? I think so:

To so many, comedy equals standup — a solo performer on a stage, asking an audience if they ever noticed how funny-sounding the word “kumquat” is. But improv is something else entirely — an unscripted, spontaneous creation of character, relationship, environment, conflict and resolution, conducted between two (or more) people. Kind of like dating.


(Read the rest of my latest Jewish Week column here.)

P-Life contemplates getting back on the ole dating horse shortly after a breakup.

Hilary at Superjux (or as I shall be calling her shortly, the Hotel Hilary) has some dating-related Thursday Things.

Annabel Lee ponders a fortune of cookie origin and copes with an overly precocious niece.

And because I’m off on an adventure, that’s all’s I got for ya right now. More to come next week…

Be excellent to each other, okay, kids?

Today’s Question of the Day

15

Over the last three weeks, three different guys (who I would have considered potentials) have told me that they’ve “given up on dating.”

Is that “guy code” for “I’m just not that into you”?

Thoughts?

Office Romance Likely; Women Usually Lose

1

According to an Australian publication, “Research shows that about 70 per cent of workers have had an office fling at some stage, one-in-four with a colleague who was married or in a long-term relationship.”

Initially, I felt bad being in the 30 percent who has never had an office affair. Never mind that my first office was full of women in their 50s, my second was teeming with rabbinical students and the home office in my apartment is no way to meet anyone, let alone married men…

But then I read the following:

But beware: if you are a woman involved with a married colleague, you will end up getting burnt. “It almost always ends in tears,” said Geoff Carter, a senior lecturer in management at Griffith University, Brisbane, who conducted the research.


First of all, mildly interesting to me that they use the term “burnt” Down Under. (But you know me. I’m language-obsessed.) Secondly, why would I want to get involved in something that had been researched and proven to “almost always” end in tears? I mean, most relationships do to begin with, and certainly most of my recent choices have “inspired” tears before they’ve even started, so I like to think of that as cutting out the middleman. Pre-emptive crying, if you will.

Go to Top