Uncategorized
Dear Dating Diary: Today I Was “Reclassified”
0
I struggle with labels, really I do. I’ve long said that everyone these days seems eager to slap a new and inventive label (Hippiedox, Conservadox, Flexidox) on themselves in order to describe their uniquely complex and nuanced relationship with Judaism ( e.g., “I go to an Orthodox shul, but go to the gym Shabbat afternoon, and will take the subway because, like a Shabbat elevator, it stops at every station anywayâ€Â). As a result, no label really means anything anymore.
So, during my brief period on Frumster, I aligned myself with the most newly founded and most liberal category or label: “Traditional and Growing.†I chose this label because not choosing a label was not an option, and because this seemed like the most moderate, the most liberal, the most (if not exactly) resemblant of my observance. All the other labels included terms that I would never use to describe myself: yeshivish, black hat, ba’al teshuvah, etc)
Because the people contacting me were never people I could see myself with religiously (and because none of them seemed to possess anything resembling a sense of humor), I deactivated my Frumster profile last month, but today, got this message from their customer support team informing me that I’d been reclassified.â€Â
For more, read the post and its 85 comments at Jewlicious. The site’s undergoing renovations, but the content’s all there…
Fear Factor: The Non-Date
9If you haven’t been there, you’re lucky.
I have been on non-dates more times than I can count. Now that I think about it, most of my dates (and all of my best dates) have been non-dates.
It always starts off as fun, promising, with a palpable potential, that by date’s end (or “non-date’s non-end” as the case may be) you’re emotionally shredded by your confusion, self-doubt and by the messages that you’re perceiving as mixed, but which in fact may not be clear, but which you are certainly resisting absorbing.
It’s like an episode of SNL’s “It’s Pat,” where you’re trying to figure out what that person is, and how they fit into your understanding of your life, and everytime you get a (romantically or) sexually charged clue, the person counters it with a term of neutrality.
So why not just ask? Just summon up some courage from a nether dimension where courage abounds as a natural resource, and spit out the words into the air? Because courage is in short supply, and we’re petrified.
And we have good reason to be scared. Most declarations of romantic intent are met with a less than enthusiastic reception, and whatever friendship was beginning to take root usually ceases to grow; it’s like our expression of honesty and yearning was death to fertile soil, the emotional equivalent of sowing the earth with salt, so that nothing will ever again grow there.
Or, as Ken puts it:
So, instead of making a fool of yourself, you go on a series of these nondates and with each passing one get progressively crazier, act increasingly weirder–you fret, you hope, you worry, you moon, you envy and, yes, you even pine–until finally you just snap and say “HOLY SHIT I CAN’T TAKE THIS ANYMORE.
YOU’RE DRIVING ME CRAZY AND I THINK I LOVE YOU.”And when that happens? Well, there’s a very, very slim chance that the other person will say, “Oh my god. Me too!” But the smart money goes on the other response: He or she shouts “Hey, look over there! It’s Steve Perry from Journey!” and then, the minute you turn your head, runs away, never to be seen from again.
Or, in the case of living in a densely packed community like the Upper West Side, you will continue to see that person everywhere. At every social event, at ever synagogue you visit, at every Shabbat dinner everywhere. Frankly, you’re going to see them anyway, so there’s no point in accelerating the misery by making them uncomfortable too. Better to pull away slightly, for the sake of your own sanity. Besides:
If you find yourself on the third or fourth hang-out, nondate or whatever, chances are you are dating this person only in your own mind. If the other person were as into you as you are into him or her, you’d already be holding hands on the subway, playing tonsil hockey in the park and generally making a nuisance of yourself in public.
And you, being a smart person, have realized that you are doing none of these things. Even if the other person makes you feel like no one else, even if there’s a connection there you haven’t felt with anyone in years, even if you have a strange conviction that this person is someone who was meant for you, you stay quiet. You wait for the signal, the one sign that will translate into a romantic green light. Sometimes you see glimmers of this everywhere…hints that the feelings run deep on both sides. But nine times out of ten, that’s called denial. The signal you’re waiting for will never come.
You learn that marinating in your own misery is preferable to cutting yourself open and plucking out your heart to offer it to a non-receptive audience. You continue your pining and mooning, and everything else, but treat it as a process of grief. All you can hope for is that after your denial and anger, eventually acceptance will come.
In the interim, you paint on your smile, hope it fools everyone else, and try to beat back the sadness.
[Inspired, obviously, by Ken’s post.]
Singles Writer Proposes in Column
11I don’t know what to think about this.
Seth Menachem, at the end of his singles column about commitment and finding the right girl, proposed to his girlfriend Carrie.
The hopeless romantic in me is weeping tears of joy for the happy couple.
And the cynical single in me is calling the whole thing too cheesy for words.
To sum up, this proposal is either:
a) the sweetest thing ever
b) vomitatious
Of course, wishing the happy couple all the best.
Romance, Religion, Kidnapping and Craigslist
4Sometimes, I find myself wishing that I was born into a more religious community, where dating would be different, and I thought, easier. A community where there is less emphasis on romantic choice, and therefore more likelihood that I would be in a different stage of adulthood by now, raising my children in perfect faith within a community that shared my values, even if I never had the chance to challenge them through emotional inquiry.
But being super-religious isn’t all fun and games in the romance department. This story has already been circulating for a few days, but I felt the need to have it here too as part of this week’s romance roundup.
The wayward son of a powerful rabbinic family kidnaps and violently abuses
his teenage sister’s would-be suitor to prevent an affair that violates the family’s strict religious codes. The real-life tale culminated in the arrest earlier this week of the wife, daughter and son of Israel’s Sephardic chief rabbi, Shlomo Amar, and two alleged Bedouin accomplices.The family members were suspected in the abduction and assault of a 17-year-old, ultra-Orthodox youth because they reportedly objected to his relationship with the rabbi’s 18-year-old daughter, Ayala, whom he met in an Internet chat room.
“In our society, as long as people are not married … no contact between a girl and a boy is acceptable,” [another of the family’s sons who was not involved in the abduction] said.
That’s in Israel. But here in America, on the internet juggernaut that is the Craigslist M4W board, we have seen posts from religious people seeking sexual liaisons with people outside their community and outside their marriages. Now (hat tip: Dov Bear), a prophet of old seems to have emerged, and has taken on Craigslist as his personal shonda (source of embarrassment) to be eradicated through the time-honored technique of tokhakhah (rebuke for the purpose that the miscreant should repent). Here’s an excerpt (spellings preserved, translations mine):
Aishes ish [relations with another man’s wife] causes mamzeirim [bastards] in klal yisoel [klal yisroel: the Jewish people]. Cheating on one’s wife is also ASUR [forbidden]! Imagine what you are doing to your children – to your families! Giluy Arayos [forbidden sexual relations] is yahareg v’al ya’avor [a sin you are commanded to die for rather than commit]! Arayos is one of the three cardinal sins – on par with muder and idolatry. This is the downfall of our society. Even if they are strictly amongst single people, it is terrible. Even if the ads are not real, they are still a terrible chilul [desecration of God’s name]. Even if you think nobody knows, it is still terrible. Even if you think nobody will ever find out, besides for you being wrong, it is still terrible.
You know I’m more moderate than the people who posted both the ads and this rebuke to the people who are looking for these liaisons. But I think that what they point to is the power of the Internet to reflect things about ourselves, and even in our most religious communities, that we wouldn’t cop to in real life.
Married people looking for no-strings sexual relationships with other people should be working on their marriages; maybe the two people were never suited for each other anyway and only got married because of parental/communal/social pressure. (“I can’t believe I’m 20, and haven’t met my bashert yet!”) Maybe they grew up thinking that boys were liars and girls were stupid. Or maybe the kids in question weren’t fully-cooked individuals and shouldn’t have committed to a relationship with someone else that was supposed to be forever while half-baked.
Whether or not there’s rebuke involved, the mere presence of these ads and the story about the kidnapping illustrates that life isn’t always greener on the other side of the religious spectrum, and that a more restrictive and isolated lifestyle isn’t always to be envied. Relationships are hard, and when it comes down to it, maybe the success of the relationship is really up to the two individuals who are trying to make it work.
“Instant” Gratification
4My new singles column, “‘Instant’ Gratification,” is now online.
In the age of the Internet, who writes love letters anymore? The romantic epistolary tradition has gone high-tech; online love is all about the Instant Message (IM) window, with its unique language of shorthand endearments: BRB (be right back), IMHO (in my humble opinion) and the ultimate phrase representing devotion and commitment potential, the coveted LOL (laughing out loud). But at the end of an e-communication, can we trust our memory of what happened? Absent of intonation and physical cues, how do we discern if a sentiment is mutual? And how real is the connection for today’s daters?
Click here to read the article in its entirety.
Thanks to all of you who helped out with this article by emailing me or leaving your comments here. This is one of those columns that has your names written all over it…
Enjoy!
Reason #34: YOU CAN NEVER NEVER NEVER TRUST A BOY
4I try to be open-minded and respectful, really I do. Occasionally, I slip into an area that’s more of a loving lampoon than an angry tirade, which is just part of being single, I think. I especially try to be open-minded to Jewish or religious ways and views which are not my own. (For instance, although I don’t choose to share her lifestyle, I linked to Nice Jewish Girl and could appreciate what she had to say. I thought it was incredibly brave for her to explore her heart’s desire in the context of her religious commitment. Others disagreed with me on the bravery front, but still…) I’d like to be that person who can get along with Jews (and in fact, non-Jews as well) of all religious stripes. It’s all good, and it’s all about love.
But today, I came across this list on FrumTeens.com, a website for religious teenagers to discuss various issues. The list (located in the “Long Skirts and ‘Platonic’ Relationships” forum of the site) is titled “71 Reasons Not to Talk to Boys.” And aside from the appalling spelling (and I mean, appalling), I’m a little frightened. I’m not saying this to ridicule the members of the list, God forbid. I just don’t understand how advocating a complete separation between the sexes until it’s courtship time can be a good thing.
Some examples (spelling and punctuation preserved)…
3) You risk getting caught by, and being thrown out of your school
Maybe because it’s not my community, but I don’t understand how talking to a boy leads to expulsion from school. In my yeshiva high school (which admittedly was co-ed), I was reprimanded for cuffing my friend Mark on the shoulder once (a rabbi saw me, and gave me a “you know you’re not supposed to touch boys” speech). But I never got the feeling that I was in any danger of expulsion.
6) You WILL NOT stay shomer negiyah [not touching the opposite sex], which is also assur [forbidden]-(a yaharog veal yaavor[a sin so grievous that you should be killed rather than transgress it])
Much discussion follows as to the exact origin of the prohibition against opposite-sex discourse, with some people disagreeing as to the character of the sin as yaharog v’al ya’avor.
7) The guy is 100% talking bad about you to his frineds in one way or another
I think this breeds a distrust of all men for all time. How do you go from being paranoid about all boys to trusting one man enough to spend your life with him? And it’s not like girls are never mean to other girls. If you can’t trust boys and you can’t trust girls, who does that leave you with?
9) Every boy is a liar, a pervert, a jerk, and you will eventually find this out
OK. I’ve got no problems with this one. I’m kidding.
I would say we can all be liars, perverts and jerks, boys and girls alike. And this one, like number 7, breeds a mistrust of all men that will undoubtedly follow the girls into their adult and married lives.
26) a guy will prob @#$% %** cus of you,, and thats like one of the wosrt averriois [sins], and im sure we get part of it
I’m guessing that missing word has something to do with self-love, but to me the concept that girls shouldn’t talk to boys because said boys might go home and think of the girls when they, ahem, you know is like saying that we should stop producing peanut butter because some people are allergic to it. OK, so it’s not a perfect analogy, but that it falls to girls to prevent adolescent boys from pleasuring themselves? Please.
And of course, there’s #34, the one that inspired my post here today:
YOU CAN NEVER NEVER NEVER TRUST A BOY
How many “never”s is that?
I’m with Maidel123, who points out:
While I agree that there are many negative elements of guys and girls talking for no particular reason it is also important not to paint the opposite gender as evil or anything of that sort. Not just because it’s not nice, but because I’m not sure I understand how, for example, a girl would make the change from thinking guys are scum etc. etc. to thinking that THE guy is the one with whom you’ll share so many things-a relationship as a couple, builders of a Jewish home, builders of a Jewish family…so while members of the opposite gender may not be APPROPRIATE they are not inherently CH”V [that’s an abbreviation for chas v’chalilah, which means God forbid] evil.
Much discussion on the boards ensues, from both boys and girls (and I suspect there are some older men and women there too, as the spelling and sentence structure is vastly improved in some of the subsequent responses).
If I were still in my yeshiva high school, as constricted as I felt there, I know that this bulletin board/forum would have been way too right-wing for me. I just hope that these girls and boys don’t grow up so scared of each other that it creates marriages that are built on foundations of mistrust and fear.
(Hat tip for the list, even though he may not like what I’ve done with it: Seraphic Secret)
Technology: Dating Friend, or Foe?
12I need your help, my readers and friends:
Does Internet-based technology (email or IM) help or hinder romance?
- How far into a relationship do you exchange email/IM info?
- Do you think people communicate better or worse over email/IM?
- How do you prefer to communicate with potential dates? (Phone, email, IM?) Why do you prefer that method over others?
- Have you ever misunderstood someone in IM/email that has led you to heartbreak or disappointment?
- Do you think the IM window is a better or worse way to get to know someone?
- Have you found that your online impression of someone (through IM or email or even through blogging) is different from how they really are in person? Has that been difficult for you to accept?
Feel free to leave your answers in the comments section, or email me with your response. Please indicate your age, location, profession (especially if you’re in a tech field) and whether you’d like to be quoted by name or by a pseudonym.
Your help is appreciated!
Can a Blog Have a Paper Anniversary?
3If it can, JDaters Anonymous’s Paper Anniversary is today.
One year of kvetching about dating, online and off, sharing ideas and stories with others who are struggling and who have struggled in their searches for love. One year of discovering the quirks of JDate and the quirks of the people who inhabit the site: some are people who are very much like us, and others are, well, not.
I’ve learned a lot this year. Hopefully, you have too. Let’s recommit to the community we’re becoming. And to the prospect and hope of finding someone to love.
If these crazy kids can make a go of it, maybe we can too.
Happy birthday, JDaters Anonymous!!
Lies Lies Lies, Yeah
7And now, from the “News That Isn’t Really News” Department…
TrueDater.com just released a study that confirms what we already suspected to be true: that online daters lie about what they really look like.
I know what you’re asking: What’s TrueDater.com? Think of it as Epinions for online dating profiles:
TrueDater.com, providing today’s online daters with the ability to read or review the truthfulness of people¹s dating profiles, asked its users which quality online daters are most likely to exaggerate in their dating profiles. Men and women both said the two qualities most likely to be misrepresented were weight and overall physical appearance.
“Amazon has book reviews, TrueDater provides dating profile reviews. Based on ourfree service, we are encouraging online daters to pledge honesty not only in their profiles, but in their everyday lives and a growing movement is championing this effort,” said Jason Jordan, TrueDater Co-Founder.
Users were asked what qualities online daters exaggerate or lie about most often. Choices were: height, weight, age, income, marital status, physical appearance and “other.”
- 34% of the respondents chose weight, with physical appearance coming in at 27%.
- Male voters ranked weight first with 45%, and physical appearance second with 20%.
- Marital status ranked third with 13%, all others received 10% or less.
- With female voters, general physical appearance ranked first with 36% of the vote, followed by weight (19%) and age (16%).
Surprisingly, female voters said men were more likely to exaggerate weight and appearance than height and income level. Also, more men than women complained that online daters had been dishonest about their marital status.
Very interesting results. Although the imbalance noted in the last paragraph (anecdotally, I know the situation to be just the opposite) has me wondering how many people they interviewed for this survey.
One last note that will sound familiar to my regular readers. There are certain elements of physical appearance that are objective, and will be learned/observed/discovered when we first meet someone. Height is one of these elements: if you’re 5’5 and tell me you’re 5’8, and if “5’8″ you and “5’5″ me are looking into each other’s eyes without the aid of heels when we finally meet, then I know, you’ve lied. Does the height matter that much, especially if the personality and humor are a match? Not to me. (Especially on JDate: I tend to automatically deduct 2-3 inches from the stated height in a JDater’s profile. For some reason Jewish guys seem to have no idea how tall they are.) But the fact that you lied? That matters a bit. And it might make a girl wonder what else you’re hiding…
And in terms of the lying about weight thing, I just need to reiterate that while weight is by definition an objective measure (even a non-science oriented person like me understands that a pound is a pound), weight looks different on different people. It can depend on how muscular a person is, how tall s/he is, the build, where s/he wears his/her weight, etc. Because of those variables, I think the “frame” descriptor is better than listing a numerical weight. Unless I’m your boxing coach (or you’re mine) and we’re prepping for a match, I maintain that there’s no need to determine whether we’re lightweights, middleweights or heavyweights. I also think it goes without saying that sometimes an internal attraction can alter a perception of physical beauty.
There’s also another component…I’m reminded of that scene from The Matrix, wherein Neo is in the simulation for the first time, and he sees himself in a certain way. Morpheus explains to him that this is the way he sees himself (even though in the “outside” world, he wears sackcloth and has all these connectors up his spine and in his head). Because we all see ourselves a certain way, we may be unable to see why a photo might be construed as an underestimation or overestimation of our physical assets. I may (theoretically) see myself as “fit” or “muscular” while someone else might describe me as “average,” “overweight,” “medium,” or even (in the Jewish world with my 5 feet and 5 inches) “tall.” In our heads, we’re all individual Neos. But how each individual set of eyes in each person in the world sees us? We can’t control that.
As for Truedater.com, who knows if it will take off. I guess that depends on how many people feel they’d like to review their dates for the site. And how many people will tune into this new site as a vetting process to decide whether or not the person’s worth going out with. And whether people will be able to distinguish the lies that matter from the unwitting misrepresentations that we undoubtedly all make when describing ourselves to others.
Welcome, New Readers
0Just wanted to welcome any new readers who might be here because of Ken Wheaton’s Metro article about bloggers who blog their dates…
Posting’s a little light this week due to Passover, but there’s lots of stuff already here, so stick around, peruse the archives and new posts will be with you shortly!
Got questions? Email me, and I’ll gladly answer.
Thanks for visiting!